Bug #11186

Priority 0 state shouldn't be labeled "Ready"

Added by Peter Amstutz about 1 month ago. Updated about 1 month ago.

Status:DuplicateStart date:
Priority:NormalDue date:
Assignee:-% Done:

0%

Category:-
Target version:-
Story points0.5
Velocity based estimate-

Related issues

Duplicates Arvados - Story #11250: [Workbench] Better user-facing terms for container states New

History

#1 Updated by Peter Amstutz about 1 month ago

  • Subject changed from Cancelled state shouldn't be labeled "Ready" to Priority 0 state shouldn't be labeled "Ready"
  • Story points set to 0.5

#2 Updated by Peter Amstutz about 1 month ago

Suggest "Stopped"

#3 Updated by Peter Amstutz about 1 month ago

  • Status changed from New to Duplicate

See #11250

Also available in: Atom PDF