Project

General

Profile

Actions

Idea #11250

closed

[Workbench] Better user-facing terms for container states

Added by Peter Amstutz over 7 years ago. Updated about 7 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assigned To:
Radhika Chippada
Category:
-
Target version:
Start date:
05/03/2017
Due date:
Story points:
-

Description

  • When a container is in the slurm queue, its state is displayed as "Locked". This is confusing to users who don't associate "Locked" with "will run in the future".

Instead of "Locked" suggest either "Queued" or Pending".

  • When a container is Queued and has priority 0, it is displayed as "Ready" state. While technically it could enabled to run by adjusting the priority, this most often occurs when a user pushed the cancel button on a container that was in the Queued or Locked state.

Instead of "Ready" suggest "Cancelled" or "Stopped".


Subtasks 1 (0 open1 closed)

Task #11565: Review branch 11250-container-state-displayResolvedLucas Di Pentima05/03/2017Actions

Related issues

Has duplicate Arvados - Bug #11186: Priority 0 state shouldn't be labeled "Ready"DuplicateActions
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF