Idea #15003
closed[config] Go package & tool for preprocessing cluster config file
Description
This tool preprocesses cluster configs so individual components only need to understand a single config object, despite complications like supporting old config formats.
Initial functionality:- Read the cluster config file from disk
- Apply defaults (perhaps by layering on-disk config after loading yaml file embedded in Go binary)
- Migrate values from old configs to their new positions (e.g., NodeProfiles → Services)
- Error out if the old configs cannot be migrated/ignored safely
- Load secrets from disk ("signing key is file:///etc/key")
- Load pre-cluster-config-file configs like keepstore.yml
- Layered configs
- Includes
Updated by Tom Clegg almost 6 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
- Story points set to 3.0
Updated by Tom Clegg almost 6 years ago
- Blocks Idea #13648: [Epic] Use one cluster configuration file for all components added
Updated by Tom Morris over 5 years ago
- Target version changed from To Be Groomed to Arvados Future Sprints
Updated by Tom Morris over 5 years ago
- Assigned To set to Tom Clegg
- Target version changed from Arvados Future Sprints to 2019-04-24 Sprint
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
- embeds the default config data in the arvados-server binary
- adds "arvados-server config-dump" and "arvados-server config-check" commands
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
- Target version changed from 2019-04-24 Sprint to 2019-05-08 Sprint
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
merged master
15003-preprocess-config @ 689901263ebfdd996da3711236615038e6245db3 -- https://ci.curoverse.com/view/Developer/job/developer-run-tests/1218/
Updated by Lucas Di Pentima over 5 years ago
This looks good AFAICT, the only thing I think it would be needed is documentation, both on the Admin site & the sub-commands' help text.
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
- Target version changed from 2019-05-08 Sprint to 2019-05-22 Sprint
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
- Related to Bug #10282: [Go programs]Warn or error when unrecognized keys appear in config files added
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
15003-preprocess-config @ 42b483f3a722ad8a506040160e54d0080a197318 -- https://ci.curoverse.com/view/Developer/job/developer-run-tests/1235/
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
- Target version changed from 2019-05-22 Sprint to 2019-06-05 Sprint
Updated by Peter Amstutz over 5 years ago
Warn if Services → Workbench2 → ExternalURL is missing or empty.
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
15003-disable-config-warnings @ 311d552b31fbb97d10cdba7e248279d197751f79 -- https://ci.curoverse.com/view/Developer/job/developer-run-tests/1254/
Disables warnings until we fill in the rest of the default/template file.
(Jenkins tests were bitten by #14878)
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
in progress...
15003-new-config-struct @ d6358ef9fc0d8474827830a7ea0a451832e1fbec -- https://ci.curoverse.com/view/Developer/job/developer-run-tests/1258/
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
- Remove NodeProfiles from config struct/docs/examples (migration allows old configs to continue working)
- Update dispatch configs to new config structure (mostly, CloudVMs.* and Dispatch.* move to Containers.CloudVMs.*)
- Add SAMPLE entries to default config file so "unknown key" checks work on sections like RemoteClusters and InstanceTypes
- Use the "service command" library for the health check aggregator (remove duplicated logging/httpserver stuff)
Updated by Lucas Di Pentima over 5 years ago
Just a couple of comments:
- Code comment at
sdk/go/arvados/config.go:L252
got outdated - Couldn’t the map from
lib/service/cmd.go:L148
be used from theMap()
func atsdk/go/arvados/config.go
?
With that, it LGTM.
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
Ah yes, the lib/service map was a subset of Map(). Fixed both, thanks.
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
15003-duration-format @ 6e73eff3926a2e7345333edd02531e8e6fbe15ef -- https://ci.curoverse.com/view/Developer/job/developer-run-tests/1272/
Spell durations like "336h" instead of "336h0m0s" when dumping config.
Updated by Lucas Di Pentima over 5 years ago
Interesting string replacing strategy :) LGTM, thanks.
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
- Target version changed from 2019-06-05 Sprint to 2019-06-19 Sprint
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
On dev clusters, Services entries seem to be incorrectly flagged as deprecated/unknown:
deprecated or unknown config entry: Clusters.4xphq.Services.Controller.InternalURLs.http://localhost:9004 deprecated or unknown config entry: Clusters.4xphq.Services.DispatchCloud.InternalURLs.http://4xphq.arvadosapi.com:9006 deprecated or unknown config entry: Clusters.4xphq.Services.RailsAPI.InternalURLs.http://localhost:8000
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
- Instead of stdin, load config from
/etc/arvados/config.yml
by default, or use-config
arg to override.
Updated by Lucas Di Pentima over 5 years ago
15003-config-default-location LGTM, thanks!
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to In Progress
- Target version changed from 2019-06-19 Sprint to 2019-07-17 Sprint
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
15003-real-configs-flagged-unknown @ 54d059bfc6d84dbc20613ddd17d812d571e93eda -- https://ci.curoverse.com/view/Developer/job/developer-run-tests/1381/
Updated by Lucas Di Pentima over 5 years ago
I believe there're at least a couple more places on the defaul config yaml file that the SAMPLE trick is needed. I tried adding to the TestCheckNoDeprecatedKeys
's test config the following:
Workbench: UserProfileFormField: testProperty: Type: text ApplicationMimetypesWithViewIcon: ruby: {}
... then ran lib/config
tests and got:
FAIL: cmd_test.go:38: CommandSuite.TestCheckNoDeprecatedKeys cmd_test.go:60: c.Check(code, check.Equals, 0) ... obtained int = 1 ... expected int = 0 cmd_test.go:62: c.Check(stderr.String(), check.Equals, "") ... obtained string = "" + ... "deprecated or unknown config entry: Clusters.z1234.Workbench.ApplicationMimetypesWithViewIcon.ruby\n" + ... "deprecated or unknown config entry: Clusters.z1234.Workbench.UserProfileFormField\n" ... expected string = "" OOPS: 18 passed, 1 FAILED
This will surely bite us in the future, do you think there's an automatic way of validating new config items?
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
I've added SAMPLE entries for those two.
As for automating this, perhaps we could load the defaults file as if it were a real config, then use reflection to detect any map[string]anything that doesn't have a SAMPLE key?
15003-real-configs-flagged-unknown @ 93cfe7c262708fb09eda5aad1839c832816d4591 -- https://ci.curoverse.com/view/Developer/job/developer-run-tests/1386/
Updated by Lucas Di Pentima over 5 years ago
Tom Clegg wrote:
[...]
As for automating this, perhaps we could load the defaults file as if it were a real config, then use reflection to detect any map[string]anything that doesn't have a SAMPLE key?
Yes, I think it would be very useful. Other possibility is to not print any warning on those empty map[string]anything
because it's assumed that's a 'list' config item? That would make unnecessary to add SAMPLE: {}
entries on the default config that are somewhat confusing IMO.
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
Lucas Di Pentima wrote:
Yes, I think it would be very useful. Other possibility is to not print any warning on those empty
map[string]anything
because it's assumed that's a 'list' config item? That would make unnecessary to addSAMPLE: {}
entries on the default config that are somewhat confusing IMO.
We'd still want to check the fields inside map[string]RemoteCluster, so we'd need samples for things like that. A map[string]struct{} can always be treated as if it had {SAMPLE: {}}, whether or not an example is given in the defaults file, so we could potentially drop those. However, I don't think it's especially easy for the checker to figure out when it's looking at a map[string]struct{} entry -- the extra-key check happens before loading into the config struct.
Updated by Lucas Di Pentima over 5 years ago
Ok, so if the SAMPLE key check is simple enough to do in this story, It'll be enough to avoid future issues like this.
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
I think the easiest way to prevent these from going undetected is a test that loads the defaults file as if it were a real config, and traverses the resulting Config object to confirm that every map[string]anything has a SAMPLE entry.
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
15003-ensure-all-sample-keys @ cfb6b08b94d423a768862481b629cfb21fcc70a2 -- https://ci.curoverse.com/view/Developer/job/developer-run-tests/1388/
This test also revealed that ManagedProperties was a map[string]interface{} with no type checks for its entries, so I fixed that.
FAIL: load_test.go:131: LoadSuite.TestDefaultConfigHasAllSAMPLEKeys load_test.go:134: s.checkSAMPLEKeys(c, "", cfg) load_test.go:118: c.Errorf("%s is a map with string keys (type %T) but config.default.yml has no SAMPLE key", path, x) ... Error: .Clusters.xxxxx.Collections.ManagedProperties.SAMPLE is a map with string keys (type map[string]interface {}) but config.default.yml has no SAMPLE key
Updated by Tom Clegg over 5 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- % Done changed from 88 to 100
Applied in changeset arvados|055512c1f803e70cb9c426a8683aa9e8ddc8170c.