Support #16441
closed
- Description updated (diff)
- Assigned To set to Peter Amstutz
- Target version changed from 2020-06-03 Sprint to 2020-06-17 Sprint
- Target version changed from 2020-06-17 Sprint to 2020-07-01 Sprint
- Status changed from New to In Progress
Some comments & questions:
- File doc/admin/link-accounts.html.textile.liquid
- Line 22: I think the word ‘by’ is missing on “…records owned the old account"
- I think we are using
zzzzz
for cluster id examples on the documentation?
- To avoid confusions, would it be best to replace “old” and “new” with “from/origin” and “to/target” or something equivalent? That would make the clarification unnecessary at the link-accounts doc page. The downside is that the API params already use “old” & “new”.
- With that, LGTM.
Lucas Di Pentima wrote:
Some comments & questions:
- File doc/admin/link-accounts.html.textile.liquid
- Line 22: I think the word ‘by’ is missing on “…records owned the old account"
- I think we are using
zzzzz
for cluster id examples on the documentation?
Fixed.
- To avoid confusions, would it be best to replace “old” and “new” with “from/origin” and “to/target” or something equivalent? That would make the clarification unnecessary at the link-accounts doc page. The downside is that the API params already use “old” & “new”.
The goal is to document how to use the 'arv' command correctly, which uses the terms "old" and "new" from the API. I agree it is confusing, but I don't think using different terms would allow us to avoid the clarification about the use of "old" and "new" because the admin needs to understand it well enough to construct the command line correctly.
Will merge, thanks.
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
Also available in: Atom
PDF