Bug #17610

[API] Federated token scopes are not obeyed if scopes include "GET .../users/current"

Added by Tom Clegg 14 days ago. Updated 8 days ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assigned To:
Tom Clegg
Category:
-
Target version:
2021-05-12 sprint
Start date:
05/03/2021
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
(Total: 0.00 h)
Story points:
-

Subtasks

Task #17611: Review 17610-remote-token-scopesResolvedTom Clegg

Related issues

Blocks Arvados - Story #17512: Release Arvados 2.2New05/03/2021

Associated revisions

Revision 6e8530d7
Added by Tom Clegg 9 days ago

Merge branch '17610-remote-token-scopes'

fixes #17610

Arvados-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Tom Clegg <>

History

#1 Updated by Tom Clegg 13 days ago

  • Target version set to 2021-05-12 sprint
  • Assigned To set to Tom Clegg
  • Status changed from New to In Progress

#2 Updated by Tom Clegg 13 days ago

Previously, in order for a token to work at a remote cluster, it had to include "GET /arvados/v1/users/current" in scopes.

Now it also has to include "GET /arvados/v1/api_client_authorizations/current".

This allows the remote cluster to obey its scopes and expiry time.

The new behavior only takes effect when both the token-checking cluster and the token-issuing cluster have been upgraded.

17610-remote-token-scopes @ 89fa46a357a5d5fc39721a3ddbe8e857a101eeef -- https://ci.arvados.org/view/Developer/job/developer-run-tests/2448/

#3 Updated by Ward Vandewege 9 days ago

#4 Updated by Ward Vandewege 9 days ago

Tom Clegg wrote:

Previously, in order for a token to work at a remote cluster, it had to include "GET /arvados/v1/users/current" in scopes.

Now it also has to include "GET /arvados/v1/api_client_authorizations/current".

This allows the remote cluster to obey its scopes and expiry time.

The new behavior only takes effect when both the token-checking cluster and the token-issuing cluster have been upgraded.

17610-remote-token-scopes @ 89fa46a357a5d5fc39721a3ddbe8e857a101eeef -- https://ci.arvados.org/view/Developer/job/developer-run-tests/2448/

Thanks, this LGTM!

#5 Updated by Tom Clegg 8 days ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 100
  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved

Also available in: Atom PDF