Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #22075

closed

documentation includes allow list of html tags in Workbench

Added by Peter Amstutz about 2 months ago. Updated 7 days ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assigned To:
Category:
Workbench2
Story points:
-

Subtasks 1 (0 open1 closed)

Task #22119: Review 22075-html-tag-doc ResolvedPeter Amstutz10/21/2024Actions

Related issues

Related to Arvados - Bug #22224: Remove obsolete fields from java sdkNewBrett SmithActions
Actions #1

Updated by Peter Amstutz about 2 months ago

  • Assigned To set to Peter Amstutz
  • Subject changed from Allow list for html tags documentation to documentation includes allow list of html tags in Workbench
Actions #2

Updated by Peter Amstutz about 1 month ago

  • Target version changed from Development 2024-09-25 sprint to Development 2024-10-09 sprint
Actions #3

Updated by Peter Amstutz 19 days ago

  • Target version changed from Development 2024-10-09 sprint to Development 2024-10-23 sprint
Actions #4

Updated by Peter Amstutz 19 days ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
Actions #6

Updated by Brett Smith 14 days ago

It would be good to update the discovery document description fields with additional information as appropriate too.

Actions #7

Updated by Peter Amstutz 7 days ago

22075-html-tag-doc @ e70a52135f2dd38b41d72e3a864f2fe1bd2cdb9f

  • All agreed upon points are implemented / addressed. Describe changes from pre-implementation design.
    • Lists valid HTML tags in the API documentation
    • Adds a new "Descriptions and metadata" section when talking about projects.
  • Anything not implemented (discovered or discussed during work) has a follow-up story.
    • n/a
  • Code is tested and passing, both automated and manual, what manual testing was done is described.
    • yes
  • New or changed UX/UX and has gotten feedback from stakeholders.
    • n/a
  • Documentation has been updated.
    • yes
  • Behaves appropriately at the intended scale (describe intended scale).
    • documentation change only.
  • Considered backwards and forwards compatibility issues between client and server.
    • documentation change only.
  • Follows our coding standards and GUI style guidelines.
    • yes
Actions #8

Updated by Lucas Di Pentima 7 days ago

  • Related to modified_by_client_uuid not being included in API's responses anymore: The Java SDK might need some updating, as it seems it still expects this field.

Changes LGTM, thanks!

Actions #9

Updated by Peter Amstutz 7 days ago

  • Related to Bug #22224: Remove obsolete fields from java sdk added
Actions #10

Updated by Peter Amstutz 7 days ago

Added #22224 to update the Java SDK. On first glance, I don't think it will produce any errors on missing fields, they will just be set to null, and it's almost certainly the case no one is using them.

Actions #11

Updated by Peter Amstutz 7 days ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF