Actions
Bug #22224
closedRemove obsolete fields from java sdk
Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assigned To:
Category:
SDKs
Target version:
Story points:
-
Release:
Release relationship:
Auto
Updated by Peter Amstutz 2 months ago
- Related to Bug #22075: documentation includes allow list of html tags in Workbench added
Updated by Brett Smith 2 months ago
22224-clean-java-sdk @ 2b89a9b70223fddf992547d5bff778c183c2c50f - developer-run-tests-doc-sdk-java-R: #2230
- All agreed upon points are implemented / addressed.
- After this branch, all of these searches under
sdk/java-v2
return no relevant results:# Methods git grep -Ei -e '\b(destroy|index|show)\b' # Resources git grep -Ei '\bapi\.client\b' | grep -v ' org\.arvados\.client\.api\.client[;.]' git grep -Ei -e job -e pipeline -e node -e repositor -e human -e specimen -e trait # Attributes git grep -Ei -e user_id -e default_owner_uuid -e href -e next_link -e next_page_token -e 'self.?link'
- After this branch, all of these searches under
- Anything not implemented (discovered or discussed during work) has a follow-up story.
- N/A
- Code is tested and passing, both automated and manual, what manual testing was done is described
- See above
- Documentation has been updated.
- Confirmed the automated Javadoc reflects the changes.
- Behaves appropriately at the intended scale (describe intended scale).
- No change in scale
- Considered backwards and forwards compatibility issues between client and server.
- We're already committed to the backwards compatibility break at the Arvados API level, this just keeps everything consistent.
- Follows our coding standards and GUI style guidelines.
- N/A (no change in style, didn't write any of my own code)
Updated by Peter Amstutz 2 months ago
Brett Smith wrote in #note-3:
22224-clean-java-sdk @ 2b89a9b70223fddf992547d5bff778c183c2c50f - developer-run-tests-doc-sdk-java-R: #2230
- All agreed upon points are implemented / addressed.
- After this branch, all of these searches under
sdk/java-v2
return no relevant results:[...]- Anything not implemented (discovered or discussed during work) has a follow-up story.
- N/A
- Code is tested and passing, both automated and manual, what manual testing was done is described
- See above
- Documentation has been updated.
- Confirmed the automated Javadoc reflects the changes.
- Behaves appropriately at the intended scale (describe intended scale).
- No change in scale
- Considered backwards and forwards compatibility issues between client and server.
- We're already committed to the backwards compatibility break at the Arvados API level, this just keeps everything consistent.
- Follows our coding standards and GUI style guidelines.
- N/A (no change in style, didn't write any of my own code)
LGTM.
Actions