Bug #6941

[Documentation] Fix www-data references in git server install guide

Added by Brett Smith about 4 years ago. Updated about 4 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assigned To:
Category:
Documentation
Target version:
Start date:
08/10/2015
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
(Total: 0.00 h)
Story points:
0.5

Description

The git server install guide references the www-data user and group in a couple of places. This user is Debian-specific: Red Hat uses nginx (or another account for other Web servers). Adjust the instructions to work across more distributions.


Subtasks

Task #7105: Fix docsResolvedPeter Amstutz

Task #7106: Review 6941-docs-fix-www-dataResolvedPeter Amstutz

Associated revisions

Revision 9494d7df
Added by Peter Amstutz about 4 years ago

Merge branch '6941-docs-fix-www-data' closes #6941

History

#1 Updated by Brett Smith about 4 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2015-09-02 sprint to Arvados Future Sprints

#2 Updated by Peter Amstutz about 4 years ago

  • Target version changed from Arvados Future Sprints to 2015-09-02 sprint

#3 Updated by Peter Amstutz about 4 years ago

  • Assigned To set to Peter Amstutz

#4 Updated by Ward Vandewege about 4 years ago

6941-docs-fix-www-data up for review LGTM.

There is one more occurrence of www-data in our install guide, in the API server installation. It's inside the runit script we recommend and prefaced with a comment that says the line may need to be modified. You could make that more explicit if you like, though the status quo seems good enough for me (and it's out of scope of this ticket).

#5 Updated by Ward Vandewege about 4 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress

#6 Updated by Peter Amstutz about 4 years ago

Ward Vandewege wrote:

6941-docs-fix-www-data up for review LGTM.

There is one more occurrence of www-data in our install guide, in the API server installation. It's inside the runit script we recommend and prefaced with a comment that says the line may need to be modified. You could make that more explicit if you like, though the status quo seems good enough for me (and it's out of scope of this ticket).

The runit script for puma you mean? I did update that comment already.

#7 Updated by Peter Amstutz about 4 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

Applied in changeset arvados|commit:9494d7df964f24d7d8d53a09233d696d4ffcc234.

Also available in: Atom PDF