Project

General

Profile

Docker security » History » Revision 4

Revision 3 (Peter Amstutz, 10/07/2016 02:29 PM) → Revision 4/7 (Peter Amstutz, 10/07/2016 02:29 PM)

h1. Docker security 

 The fundamental Docker security issue is that a    "root" (uid 0) user inside container is equivalent to "root" outside, unless steps are taken to limit container permissions.    We want to disallow containers from sending data outside the private Arvados network, prevent breakout from the container, and limit access if a breakout does occur.    We don't allow end users to invoke Docker directly, so we can impose security measures both in the daemon configuration and the individual container invocation. 

 Some of the knobs we have include: 

 

 h2. Setting the uid/gid of pid 1 in container 

 docker run --user 

 We can explicitly set the uid/gid of pid 1 inside the container so it is not uid 0.    This overrides the USER directive of the image.    One drawback is that some programs behave badly when the current uid 
 cannot be found in /etc/passwd. 

 

 h2. User id mapping 

 docker daemon --userns-remap 

 User ids inside container corresponds to a different host user id. Can map uid 0 inside the container to non-root user outside the container.    Processes have two sets of capabilities; one set of capabilities apply when manipulating resources inside the user namespace, a second set of capabilities apply when manipulating resources in the parent namespace.    This makes it possible for a process to be "root" inside the container but "non-root" outside the container. 

 http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/user_namespaces.7.html 

 This may also be useful for working with bind-mounted directories.    Mapping "root" to the host user "crunch" would mean that files written by "root" inside the container would actually be owned by "crunch" outside the container.    Because user id mappings are 1:1, this would require always using the same uid inside the container (probably uid 0). 

 h2. Dropping capabilities 

 docker run --drop-cap 

 Drop capabilities of root user inside the container ("man capabilities" for list).    Dropping all capabilities effectively neuters the root user (for example, without CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE the root 
 user is subject to the same file permission checks as regular users). Can be used to limit the scope of what "root" user can do inside the container. 

 h2. Restrict container networking 

 docker run --net=none 

 Crunch v2 communicates via arv-mount, which means most containers don't need networking to read/write to Keep.    Crunch v2 policy is that networking is disabled by default but can be enabled with the runtime constraint @API: true@ (necessary for Arvados-aware containers).    The Docker network bridge should be configured with firewall whitelist that limits communication to essential Arvados services (API server + Keep server). 

 h2. Disable inter-container communication 

 docker daemon --icc=false 

 Our containers don't need to talk to each other. 

 h2. Resource limits via cgroups 

 Slurm can set up a cgroup (control group) to dictate resource limits, and crunch-run can instruct Docker to put the container in the cgroup set up by slurm.    Note, for this to work, we may need to invoke the Docker daemon with this option: 

 --exec-opt native.cgroupdriver=cgroupfs 

 Further research is required to see if slurm cgroup settings are sufficient to prevent overloading the node or denial-of-service, or if we need to set other limits (for example, a limit on the number of processes inside the container to prevent forkbomb attacks.) 

 h2. Resource limits via ulimit 

 We can also set ulimits on daemon invocation (--default-ulimit) and on container invocation (--ulimit).    ulimit has some overlap with cgroups but the difference seems to be that most ulimit settings apply per-process rather than to a group of processes. 

 h2. seccomp 

 Seccomp filters system calls that can be made by programs inside the container; many system calls it filters can also be blocked by dropping capabilities. 

 https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/seccomp/ 

 h2. AppArmor 

 Can further limit what programs (including those running as "root") inside the container can do.    To be really effective, need to tailor profiles to specific application containers. 

 https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/apparmor/ 

 h2. SELinux 

 docker daemon --selinux-enabled 

 Enable SELinux support.    I don't know what that entails.