Multi-cluster user database » History » Version 2
Tom Clegg, 07/25/2019 01:52 PM
1 | 1 | Tom Clegg | h1. Multi-cluster user database |
---|---|---|---|
2 | |||
3 | It is sometimes desirable to share a single user database across multiple Arvados clusters. For example: |
||
4 | * Clusters aaaaa, bbbbb, ccccc are on different continents. |
||
5 | * A down/unreachable cluster should not prevent a user from accessing _other_ clusters -- even if the down/unreachable cluster is normally the best/default one from that user's perspective. |
||
6 | |||
7 | This requires some changes to authentication (obtaining and validating API tokens). |
||
8 | |||
9 | h2. Obtaining tokens |
||
10 | |||
11 | 2 | Tom Clegg | Each user should be able to log in to their account using any cluster, regardless of where/whether they have logged in previously. This contrasts with the current setup, where each user account has a "home cluster" which must be used to log in. |
12 | 1 | Tom Clegg | |
13 | To achieve this (without depending real-time communication between clusters) we need all of the participating clusters to agree on a mapping of upstream authentication results to Arvados user UUIDs. For example, if the upstream authentication result is @"ldap://ldap.example foo@bar.example"@ ("ldap://ldap.example assures us this user is foo@bar.example"): |
||
14 | # If a row already exists in the users table with <code>upstream == "ldap://ldap.example foo@bar.example"</code> then use that row |
||
15 | # Otherwise, create a new row with user UUID "fffff-tpzed-${sha1part(upstream)}" (where fffff is a common prefix used by all participating clusters and sha1part() is the first 15 chars of base-36-encoded sha1()) |
||
16 | |||
17 | 2 | Tom Clegg | To avoid changing existing user accounts' UUIDs to @fffff-*@, we would do a one-time synchronization of user accounts (and their upstreams) across all participating clusters. For example, if aaaaa-tpzed-012340123401234 exists on cluster aaaaa, we would add that row to bbbbb and ccccc as well. Next time a user logs in to bbbbb with an upstream account matching aaaaa-tpzed-012340123401234, bbbbb would issue a token itself, rather than deferring to aaaaa. |
18 | 1 | Tom Clegg | |
19 | 2 | Tom Clegg | Untrusted remote accounts (the kind that we already have in the users table with foreign UUIDs) have a null upstream field. |
20 | |||
21 | |uuid |upstream |significance | |
||
22 | |aaaaa-tpzed-aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa |google:// foo@bar.example |Imported/migrated from remote cluster aaaaa | |
||
23 | |fffff-tpzed-012340123401234 |ldap://ldap.example foo@baz.example |User didn't exist before the multi-cluster user db system arrived | |
||
24 | |ooooo-tpzed-ooooooooooooooo |NULL |Remote user from cluster ooooo (not part of our multi-cluster group) | |
||
25 | |||
26 | 1 | Tom Clegg | h2. Validating tokens |
27 | |||
28 | 2 | Tom Clegg | Each cluster should be able to validate a token that was issued by a different, currently unreachable, cluster. This contrasts with the current setup, where aaaaa validates tokens issued by bbbbb by doing a callback to bbbbb. |
29 | 1 | Tom Clegg | |
30 | This seems easy enough: instead of random strings, tokens can be [like] JWT, signed by a private key whose public part is known by all clusters. (This would be more efficient than callbacks even for mutually untrusted clusters.) |
||
31 | 2 | Tom Clegg | |
32 | h2. Configuration |
||
33 | |||
34 | Each cluster needs to |
||
35 | |||
36 | <pre><code class="yaml"> |
||
37 | Clusters: |
||
38 | aaaaa: |
||
39 | RemoteClusters: |
||
40 | bbbbb: |
||
41 | Proxy: true |
||
42 | fffff: |
||
43 | |||
44 | </code></pre> |