Project

General

Profile

Pipelines as jobs » History » Version 2

Peter Amstutz, 09/02/2014 11:59 AM

1 1 Peter Amstutz
h1. Pipeline runner as job
2
3
h2. Problem
4
5
arv-run-pipeline-instance is currently a special priviledged pipeline runner.  However, there are potentially many other pipeline runners we would like to support, such as bcbio-nextgen, rmake, snakemake, Nextflow, etc.
6
7
The current solution is to run these as a normal job.  That job either a) submits stages as subtasks or b) submits stages as additional jobs.  The problem with (a) is that job reuse features are not available, and all subtasks must be able to run out of the same docker image.  The problem with (b) is that the controller job currently ties up a whole node, even though it is generally idle, and we currently do not track the process tree (which job submissions were made by which other jobs.)
8
9
h2. Proposed solution
10
11
Remove arv-run-pipeline-instance from its priviledged position and run it as a job in a container just like everything else.  Fix crunch-dispatch so the pipeline runner job only takes up a single slot and other jobs or tasks can be scheduled on the node.  Use the API token associated with the job to track which job submissions were made by the controlling job.  Rewrite the way pipelines are presented to show the actual process tree.
12
13
h2. Related ideas
14
15 2 Peter Amstutz
Currently, porting tools like bcbio or rmake still requires the tool be modified so that it schedules jobs on the cluster instead of runnig locally.  We could use LD_PRELOAD to intercept a whitelist of exec() calls and redirect them to a script that causes the tool to run on the cluster.