Bug #8840
Updated by Peter Amstutz about 9 years ago
API server Job.lock uses a "transaction" but this doesn't guarantee atomic read-update-write operations. Need to use "with_lock" instead.
Implemented in branch 8840-lock-job-record.
Updated by Peter Amstutz about 9 years ago
API server Job.lock uses a "transaction" but this doesn't guarantee atomic read-update-write operations. Need to use "with_lock" instead.
Implemented in branch 8840-lock-job-record.