Websocket server » History » Version 4
Tom Clegg, 06/23/2016 06:53 PM
1 | 1 | Tom Clegg | h1. Websocket server |
---|---|---|---|
2 | |||
3 | (early draft) |
||
4 | |||
5 | {{toc}} |
||
6 | |||
7 | h2. Background |
||
8 | |||
9 | The Rails API server can function as a websocket server. Clients (notably Workbench, arv-mount, arv-ws) use it to listen for events without polling. |
||
10 | |||
11 | Problems with current implementation: |
||
12 | 3 | Tom Clegg | * Unreliable. See #9427, #8277 |
13 | 1 | Tom Clegg | * Resource-heavy (one postgres connection per connected client, uses lots of memory) |
14 | * Logging is not very good |
||
15 | * Updates look like database records instead of API responses (e.g., computed fields are missing, collection manifest_text has no signatures) |
||
16 | 3 | Tom Clegg | * Offers an API for catching up on missed events after disconnecting/reconnecting, but this API (let alone the code) isn't enough to offer a "don't miss any events, don't send any events twice" guarantee. See #9388 |
17 | 1 | Tom Clegg | |
18 | 3 | Tom Clegg | #8460 |
19 | |||
20 | h2. Desired features |
||
21 | |||
22 | Monotonically increasing event IDs, so clients can (meaningfully) request "all matching events since X" |
||
23 | |||
24 | 1 | Tom Clegg | h2. Design sketch |
25 | |||
26 | New server, written in Go. |
||
27 | |||
28 | One goroutine per connected client. |
||
29 | |||
30 | One database connection receiving notifications about new logs. (Possibly still N database connections serving "catch-up" messages to N clients.) |
||
31 | 2 | Tom Clegg | |
32 | h2. Libraries |
||
33 | |||
34 | Websocket: |
||
35 | * https://godoc.org/golang.org/x/net/websocket |
||
36 | |||
37 | PostgreSQL: |
||
38 | 1 | Tom Clegg | * https://godoc.org/github.com/lib/pq via https://godoc.org/database/sql |
39 | * https://godoc.org/github.com/lib/pq#hdr-Notifications and https://godoc.org/github.com/lib/pq/listen_example |
||
40 | 3 | Tom Clegg | |
41 | h2. Obstacles |
||
42 | |||
43 | #8565, #8566 |
||
44 | 4 | Tom Clegg | |
45 | h2. Related |
||
46 | |||
47 | It might be expedient to offload synchronization to some existing software that does this well. |
||
48 | * "Apache Zookeeper":https://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/trunk/zookeeperOver.html -- "Coordination services are notoriously hard to get right. They are especially prone to errors such as race conditions and deadlock. The motivation behind ZooKeeper is to relieve distributed applications the responsibility of implementing coordination services from scratch." |
||
49 | * Google "Chubby":http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//archive/chubby-osdi06.pdf paper |