Feature #9570
closed[CWL] Support CWL v1.0
Related issues
Updated by Nico César over 8 years ago
reviewed the code
and triggered https://ci.curoverse.com/job/developer-test-job/136/
I saw no new tests in that branch. are they anywhere else?
also: the failing package build still there. https://ci.curoverse.com/job/build-packages-debian7/203/
but with a different problem (like the .deb package for cwlrunner for example)
Updated by Nico César over 8 years ago
so when we build the packages we need to update the version in run-build-packages.sh too. This is my patch for cwltool
diff --git a/build/run-build-packages.sh b/build/run-build-packages.sh index f2894e3..93df0b2 100755 --- a/build/run-build-packages.sh +++ b/build/run-build-packages.sh @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ fpm_build schema_salad "" "" python 1.12.20160610104117 fpm_build ruamel.yaml "" "" python 0.11.11 --python-setup-py-arguments "--single-version-externally-managed" # And for cwltool we have the same problem as for schema_salad. Ward, 2016-03-17 -fpm_build cwltool "" "" python 1.0.20160630171631 +fpm_build cwltool "" "" python 1.0.20160712154127 # FPM eats the trailing .0 in the python-rdflib-jsonld package when built with 'rdflib-jsonld>=0.3.0'. Force the version. Ward, 2016-03-25 fpm_build rdflib-jsonld "" "" python 0.3.0
to avoid https://ci.curoverse.com/job/build-packages-debian7/203/
AND also there is a version of schema_salad to review there. Can you fill it in with the correct one too?
Thanks,
Updated by Nico César over 8 years ago
test 331f76650627e742c0fc76d7c5fe37cdac847330
LGTM .. https://ci.curoverse.com/job/build-packages-debian7/204/ was happy
Updated by Peter Amstutz over 8 years ago
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset arvados|commit:8af4c785ee48083eac92a0bd1ccd0bf4c41a9410.
Updated by Peter Amstutz over 8 years ago
- Target version set to 2016-07-20 sprint
Updated by Peter Amstutz over 8 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to In Progress
Reopening for bug fixes.
Updated by Nico César over 8 years ago
test 0d4726056080f8c865135e0f576ccc15d4f388b9
I read the code in this ticket. the code didn't have any major issues, but It's hard for me to test this without deploying... how are you even testing this ?
Updated by Peter Amstutz over 8 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset arvados|commit:5cf55ab0cfe55cbd803b61736276044f7008bfa4.